Skilled Dispute Resolution

Settlement Counsel vs Mediation

Most disputes are settled before they ever reach trial. Unfortunately, by the time a settlement is reached, generally just before trial, the parties have already exhausted a great deal of resources including, time, money, and overall peace of mind. That being the case, reaching a fair settlement sooner rather than later should be the primary goal. The main function of both a mediator and settlement counsel is to bring disputing parties together to reach an agreement that is acceptable to everyone.


As a neutral third party, a mediator works with both sides to assist in the crafting of an agreement that resolves the dispute. Mediators are experienced professionals that employ their skills to identify important issues to guide the parties toward their own resolution. Mediation works well when both disputing parties are willing to commit to reaching a settlement and commit to the mediation process. A mediator is retained by all sides collectively and strives to help all sides find common ground.


Settlement Counsel represents clients by focusing on settling the dispute while separate litigation counsel focuses on moving the case along procedurally and prepares for trial. Most often in the early stages of litigation, settlement counsel is retained to identify disputes that can readily be resolved without protracted litigation. Settlement counsel actively initiates communication and handles all settlement negotiations. Settlement counsel is retained by one side, is not a neutral third party and actively attempts to move the parties toward an acceptable resolution.

Both mediators and settlement counsel can be valuable assets in assisting disputing parties in reaching a just and fair settlement. Contact Sound Agreements today.




Neutral Third Party

Settlement Counsel

Settlement Focused Attorney